Cases 51 - 60 of 303
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02943
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America et al v. Steel Dynamics, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Indiana State of and United States of America
Defendant:
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
Wiand v. Family Tree Estate Planning, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv00361
Defendant:
Lifeline Innovations & Insurance Solutions LLC, Elliott Financial Group, Inc., MASears LLC d/b/a Picasso Group and others
Plaintiff:
Burton Wiand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Mund & Fester GMBH & Co. KG v. Logistics Dynamics, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv20242
Defendant:
LOGISTICS DYNAMICS, LLC, LOGISTICS DYNAMICS, INC., and Warsaw Transport Inc.
Plaintiff:
MUND & FESTER GMBH & CO. KG, as subrogee of PI Berries SpA and Berry Fresh LLC and Mund & Fester GMBH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707
Fester & Co. GMBH v. Logistics Dynamics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv20188
Plaintiff:
Fester & Co. a/s/o of PI Berries SpA and Berry Fresh LLC and Fester & Co. GMBH
Defendant:
Logistics Dynamics LLC and Logistics Dynamics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707
Boards of Trustees of the Local 191 IBEW Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Control Dynamics Inc
as 2:2020cv01774
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of the Local 191 IBEW Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Northwest Washington Electrical Industry Joint Apprenticeship & Training Trust and Local 191 IBEW Money Purchase Plan
Defendant:
Control Dynamics Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Phillips v. Delaney
as 20-3905
Defendant / Appellant:
Institutes of Applied Human Dynamics, Inc., Mary T. St. Marks, individually, Office of Persons with Developmental Disabilities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Charles Phillips, each individually as residents and as Area Representative of Prospect Park, Alfred J. Vent, h individually as residents and as Area Representative in Prospect Park and Alfred J. Vent, each individually as residents and as Area Representative in Prospect Park
Defendant:
Thomas Roach, individually and as Mayor of the City of (White Plains) New York and City of White Plains, New York
Plaintiff:
Jay Weinberger, as resident of Prospect Park
Phillips v. Delaney
as 20-3734
Defendant / Appellee:
City of White Plains, New York, Kerry A. Delaney, individually and as Acting Commission of the Office of Persons with Developmental Disabilities, Stanley Silverstein, individually and as Director of Institutes of Applied Human Dynamics and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alfred J. Vent, h individually as residents and as Area Representative in Prospect Park and Charles Phillips, each individually as residents and as Area Representative of Prospect Park
Plaintiff:
Jay Weinberger, as resident of Prospect Park
Hugo & Hudson Limited v. Oracle Dynamics, Inc.
as 1:2020cv08614
Defendant:
Oracle Dynamics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hugo & Hudson Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
