Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Edmer Barrios Garcia v. DHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1037
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDMER EUDULIO BARRIOS GARCIA
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 20-56297
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBEN DARIO MENCIAS SOTO, ALEX HERNANDEZ, ARISTOTELES SANCHEZ MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAD F. WOLF, DAVID P. PEKOSKE, JACKI BECKER KLOPP and others
Muir v. United States Transportation Security Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01280
Defendant: L3Harris Technologies, Inc., United States Transportation Security Administration, David P Pekoske and others
Plaintiff: Michael Gibson Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed Jibril, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5202
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher A. Wray, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, David P. Pekoske, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ala'a Jibril, individually, Mohammed Jibril, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J., Aida Shahin, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J. and others
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55634
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBEN DARIO MENCIAS SOTO, ALEX HERNANDEZ, ARISTOTELES SANCHEZ MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAD F. WOLF, DAVID P. PEKOSKE, JACKI BECKER KLOPP and others
Tory McLaurin v. David P. Pekoske et al
as 2:2020cv04660
Respondent: Tiffany Ku, Eric W. Kaplan, John Busch and others
Petitioner: Tory Ariel McLaurin and Tory McLaurin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Saadiq Long v. William Barr
as 20-1406
Petitioner: LESHAUNA DAVES, JUANGJAN DAVES and SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capactiy, only, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security, in her official capacity, only; and others
Sai v. David Pekoske, et al
as 20-15615
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAI, on Plaintiff's own behalf, and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID P. PEKOSKE, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as acting Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
as 20-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, CATO INSTITUTE, FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW & EQUALITY and others
Not Yet Classified: ALAN MICHAEL MYGATT-TAUBER
Charles Kable, IV v. Anas Elhady
as 20-154
Respondent: MICHAEL EDMUND COLEMAN, MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN, JOHN DOE, No. 4 and others
Petitioner: CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?