Cases 51 - 60 of 523
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Rebecca Hunter, Tennessee Department of Human Resources, Debbie Inglis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pabon et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00139
Plaintiff:
Henry Pabon and Kelin Pabon
Defendant:
Vincent Emil Derrick and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frazier v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00268
Defendant:
Herbert H Slatery and State of Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Clark Derrick Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv02444
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Derrick Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Waterford Place Apartments v. Bynum
as 2:2019cv02411
Not Yet Classified:
Clerk Edward L. Stanton, Jr.
Defendant:
Derrick Bynum
Plaintiff:
Waterford Place Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foy et al v. Welding Ceramics, LLC et al (TV3)
as 1:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
Maurice Edwards, Derrick Smartt and John Foy, Jr
Defendant:
Richard F. Durham, Jr and Welding Ceramics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rager v. McMinn County (RLJ2)
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
McMinn County, Derrick Saxe and Joe Guy
Plaintiff:
Jaimie Rager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovingood v. Monroe County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Monroe County, Tennessee, Bill Johnson and Derrick Graves
Plaintiff:
Andrew Josten Lovingood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenlee v. Nurse Shawnda et al
as 3:2018cv00496
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, Glenn Ballenger, Sgt Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Greenlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
