Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Dickerson et al v. Weather Shield Manufacturing Inc
as 4:2011cv02915
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dickerson and Michele Dickerson
Defendant:
Weather Shield Transportation Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickerson v. McCabe
as 8:2011cv01412
Petitioner:
Joseph Dickerson
Respondent:
Wayne McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dickerson v. USA
as 3:2010cv70287
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marlon Jermaine Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dickerson v. Ninth Judical Circuit Court, The et al
as 2:2010cv02303
Plaintiff:
Ismail Dickerson
Defendant:
Ninth Judical Circuit Court, The, R Markley Dennis, Jr, Charleston County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar et al v. Mack et al
as 8:2010cv01775
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dunbar, Reginald C Mack, Lloyd Bennett and others
Defendant:
James Metts and City Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Charleston Police Department, City of et al
as 1:2010cv01625
Plaintiff:
Ismail Dickerson
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department, City of, L Reed, B Wanamaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-SVH Dickerson v. City of Charleston Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv02268
Plaintiff:
Ismail Dickerson
Defendant:
City of Charleston Police Department , Officer LaFromboise , Officer Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dickerson v. City of Charleston Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv02268
Plaintiff:
Ismail Dickerson
Defendant:
City of Charleston Police Department, Officer LaFromboise, Officer Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dickerson v. Alewine
as 6:2009cv02109
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dickerson
Defendant:
Dr Alewine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
