Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Emery v. County of Dakota
as 8:2015cv03009
Defendant:
County of Dakota and Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Ada Joann Emery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Emery et al v. County of Dakota
as 4:2015cv03009
Defendant:
County of Dakota and Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Ada Joann Emery and Phillip Wayne Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Nelson v. Carson Valley United Methodist Church
as 4:2013cv03113
Defendant:
Carson Valley United Methodist Church, Does 1-5 and Roe Companies 1-3
Plaintiff:
Gregg M. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Kennedy v. County of Lancaster, et al
as 4:2012cv03247
Defendant:
County of Lancaster and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Mark Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Harper v. University of Nebraska Omaha, et al
as 8:2011cv00030
Defendant:
Does 1-5 and University of Nebraska Omaha
Plaintiff:
Tristan Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lutt v. County of Hall et al
as 8:2010cv00440
Defendant:
City of Grand Island, County of Hall and Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Personal Representat Joel Lutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
