Cases 51 - 60 of 101
KEARNEY v. BOP
as 2:2015cv00278
Plaintiff:
DONNELL SHAMOND KEARNEY
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamal et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2014cv02148
Plaintiff:
Mumia Abu Jamal , Robert L. Holbrook , Human Rights Coalition and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTY v. ATLANTIC EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv05125
Plaintiff:
DONNELL MCCARTY
Defendant:
ATLANTIC EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION CORP. and APRIL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02667
Plaintiff:
DEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHARLES RAMSEY , JOHN O'CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
O'DONNELL v. TINICUM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv02171
Plaintiff:
BRIAN O'DONNELL
Defendant:
TINICUM TOWNSHIP , WILLIAM H. YOUNG and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rollins v. O'Donnell et al
as 3:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Trent Rollins
Defendant:
O'Donnell, D. Bunner and John Kerestes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv07428
Petitioner:
DONNELL BENNETT
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2013cv01405
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOORE, JR.
Defendant:
J. BARRY JOHNSON, MAJOR SHIRLEY, CAPTAIN B. O'DONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv02443
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Barry Johnson, Shirley, B O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
