Cases 51 - 60 of 172
Downs et al v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 3:2019cv01125
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Renaissance Maintenance Inc, Renaissance Maintenance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Downs and Duane Downs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv04285
Defendant:
TERRY, ROSHAY, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES INGRAM and CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELL v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv04287
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CONYERS, J. MALLOT, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS I. SNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEFLORE v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv04279
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, AARON LONG, J.D. BALLENGER and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEFLORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAYLESS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2019cv00467
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DUANE BAYLESS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DECATUR COUNTY JAIL, CHRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYKINS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2019cv03817
Plaintiff:
DEADRIAN BOYKINS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CONYERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES and DUANE ALSIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAPLER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv03343
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY CAPLER
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT E. CARTER and DUANE ALSIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLEMAN et al v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC., NIKKI TAFOYA, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ZARAGOZA and ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEFFERS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv03278
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT E. CARTER and DUANE ALSIP
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JEFFERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANUEL v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv03299
Plaintiff:
DARRELL L. MANUEL, SR.
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT E. CARTER and DUANE ALSIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
