Cases 51 - 60 of 277
Ernest Glover, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10803
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST LEE GLOVER, JR., also known as Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Bennett v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Devin Bennett
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2017cv00329
Petitioner:
Earnest Lee Anderson
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00105
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Crawford
Respondent:
Pelicia Hall and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newell v. Lee
as 2:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Derrick Newell
Defendant:
Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estate Of Earnest Lee Boyland, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 17-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Estate of Earnest Lee Boyland, Estate of David Shelton, Estate of Lee Sylvester Caldwell and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, EPIQ Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc., United States Department of Agriculture Hispanic & Women Farmers And Ranchers Claims Administrator and others
Harbin v. Turner et al
as 4:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
David Lee Harbin
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Felicia Hall, Jacquelyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Lee et al
as 2:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Owen Nelson
Defendant:
Earnest Lee and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Campbell v. Angela Brown, et al
as 17-60248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA BROWN, Nurse Practitioner, EARNEST LEE, Superintendent, MR. PAIGE, Officer and others
Pointer v. Lee et al
as 3:2017cv00056
Petitioner:
Larry Pointer, III
Defendant:
Earnest Lee and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
