Cases 51 - 60 of 269
Marco Velez v. Warden, FCI Estill
as 20-6641
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FCI ESTILL
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO VELEZ
Anderson v. FCI Estill SC
as 8:2020cv01966
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson
Defendant:
FCI Estill SC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03375
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTILL ALAN CAREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kier v. FCI Estill SC
as 8:2020cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert L Kier
Defendant:
FCI Estill SC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. US Department of Federal Torts Branch et al
as 6:2020cv01066
Defendant:
Lisa McMahon, Hope L Swann, US Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobka et al v. Warden, Estill Federal Prison Camp, Estill South Carolina et al
as 1:2020cv21692
Defendant:
Warden, Estill Federal Prison Camp, Estill South Carolina and President Trump
Plaintiff:
Michael Bobka and Richard Bobka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bobka et al v. Warden et al
as 0:2020cv01834
Respondent:
Warden, Estill Federal Prison Camp, Estill South Carolina and President Trump
Petitioner:
Michael Bobka and Richard Bobka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bobka v. Warden et al
as 0:2020cv01798
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons SERO Atlanta, GA, Warden, Estill Federal Prison Camp and Warden
Petitioner:
Richard Bobka and Michael Bobka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bobka v. Warden, Estill Federal Prison Camp et al
as 1:2020cv01791
Petitioner:
Michael Bobka and Richard Bobka
Respondent:
Warden, Estill Federal Prison Camp and Federal Bureau of Prisons SERO Atlanta, GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Bareno et al
as 2:2020cv00633
Defendant:
Sgt Benjamin Estill, Dr Bareno, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
