Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Sanchez v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Mr. Smith, Mr. Jones, Ms. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Sussex I State Prison
as 1:2016cv01177
Plaintiff:
Neapolean Jwan Freeman
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company et al v. Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America , Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc., Macon F. Brock, Douglas T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Unknown
as 1:2015cv01104
Plaintiff:
Neapoleon Juan Freeman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Clark
as 3:2015cv00483
Petitioner:
Antonio Freeman
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Devine et al v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Devine , Nathaniel Adibi , William L. Alexander and others
Defendant:
City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Western World Insurance Company v. Morales et al
as 4:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Western World Insurance Company
Defendant:
Katty Morales, Clarine Saint-Ange, Philip Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Freeman v. Willis, III, DDS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Elizare Freeman
Defendant:
J. Dewey Willis, III, DDS, LLC and J. Dewey Willis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Copeland, Jr. v. Shrom / RN et al
as 2:2013cv00584
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Dennis Copeland, Jr.
Defendant:
J Shrom / RN, A. Freeman, C/O Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Chapman et al
as 1:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
Harry Lenzy Wallace
Defendant:
Michael Chapman, Ricky Frye, Jeffrey Ebersole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
