Cases 51 - 60 of 210
Thomas v. Scott et al
as 9:2020cv02657
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Laquawn Thomas
Defendant:
James Floyd, Justin Morris and Kimberly Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carelock v. Palmer et al
as 5:2020cv01833
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Jason Miles, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carelock v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020cv01635
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Lynnette Patton, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 6:2020cv01309
Defendant:
B Stirling, A M Wilson, Beth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd et al v. Spartanburg South Carolina, City of
as 7:2020cv01305
Plaintiff:
Gordon Farms Inc and John F Floyd
Defendant:
Spartanburg South Carolina, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parson v. Marion County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2020cv01222
Defendant:
John Q Atkinson, Jr, Tracey Causey, Marion County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Parson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Floyd v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 4:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Linda Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. Deloitte & Touche LLP et al
as 3:2019cv03304
Plaintiff:
Samuel R Floyd, III
Defendant:
Deloitte & Touche LLP and Deloitte LLP
Cook et al v. South Carolina Public Service Authority et al
as 6:2019cv03285
Defendant:
South Carolina Public Service Authority, Santee Cooper, Barry Wynn and others
Plaintiff:
Cyril B Rush, Jr, Corrin F Bowers & Son, Chris Kolbe and others
Petitioner:
Mr. Kevin Marsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez Perez v. Floyd et al
as 9:2019cv01984
Defendant:
Frederick J. Goulding, MD, Carolyn V. Rickards, C. E. Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Cresencio Perez Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
