Cases 51 - 60 of 69
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Taqueria Flores
as 2:2010cv08632
Defendant:
Jose Francisco Flores
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
In re: Swift Transportation Company,, et al
as 10-14081
Petitioner:
In re: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC., FRANCISCO FLORES CASTILLO and SWIFT LEASING CO., INC.
USA v. Francisco Flores-Babichi
as 10-10345
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO FLORES-BABICHI
Tavira et al v. 1443 York Gotham Pizza, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03689
Plaintiff:
Hosgan Tavira , Esteban Flores , Francisco Flores and others
Defendant:
1443 York Gotham Pizza, Inc., 1667 First Gotham Pizza, Inc., 144 Ninth Gotham Pizza, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burrowes v. Swift Transportation Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Courtney E. Burrowes
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company, Inc. , Francisco Flores Castillo , State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Sopramco CV9 CFL, LLC v. Flores-Miranda
as 3:2010cv01205
Plaintiff:
Sopramco CV9 CFL, LLC
Defendant:
Angel Francisco Flores-Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Francisco Flore
as 10-50076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO FLORES, AKA Lil Frank
US v. Flores
as 09-2036
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCISCO FLORES, a/k/a Beblas
:
and
Solis v. OLFF, Inc. d/b/a Doctor's Care Home Health et al
as 7:2009cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis and Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
OLFF, Inc. d/b/a Doctor's Care Home Health and Francisco Flores
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Flores-Reyes v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2009cv00438
Plaintiff:
Francisco Flores-Reyes
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and President
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
