Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Terrell v. Mills
as 3:2011cv01108
Petitioner:
Javonte Demontez Terrell
Respondent:
David G. Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Libri v. NeSmith et al
as 3:2011cv05338
Plaintiff:
Nathan Andres Libri
Defendant:
Brian M. NeSmith , David W. Hanna , James A. Barth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Libri v. NeSmith et al
as 5:2011cv05338
Plaintiff:
Nathan Andres Libri
Defendant:
Brian M. NeSmith, David W. Hanna, James A. Barth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koklich v. Yates et al
as 1:2011cv01507
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. Yates et al
as 1:2011at00561
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Mr. Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011at00554
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Clark J. Kelso, James A. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Outdoor Venture Corporation v. Mills
as 6:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Outdoor Venture Corporation
Defendant:
Karen G. Mills , David Baucom and United States of America, Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011at00503
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Means v. Mills
as 2:2011cv02646
Petitioner:
Courtney Means
Respondent:
David G. Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
