Cases 51 - 60 of 202
Martin v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Terry Glenn Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robertson v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Glenn Robertson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim - Personal Injury/Motor Vehicle
Goode v. Youngkin et al
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dezachtre R. Goode
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Sears and Jason Miyaris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Ford v. Northam et al
as 7:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Northam, Glenn Youngkin, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bentz et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., Shandong Taihe Dongxin Co. Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bentz, Scott Spires, James Blankenship and others
Doe v. Yates
as 3:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Glenn Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vogel et al v. Gracias Juan, LLC
as 1:2021cv01355
Plaintiff:
Glenn Vogel and Doug Lee
Defendant:
Gracias Juan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kandare v. Kandare et al
as 2:2021cv00577
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kandare
Defendant:
Wesley Kandare, Joanne Kandare Gillies, Glenn Kandare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
