Cases 51 - 60 of 233
Marshall County, Alabama et al v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 4:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Marshall County, Alabama , Albertville, Alabama, City of , Arab, Alabama and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L P, Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company Inc, The and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sutton v. Ivey et al
as 5:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ronald . Sutton
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00009
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Gordon v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2017cv02113
Plaintiff:
Annie Grant Gordon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Giles v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Samuel Giles
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham, Major Robinson, Lt. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinnie v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Fred Deangelo Quinnie
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Koch Foods, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2017mc03795
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Garnishee:
Koch Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
LaQuanta Grant
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Middleton v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Middleton
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Benoit et al
as 7:2017cv01442
Plaintiff:
William Grant Ball
Defendant:
Richard Benoit , Eagle Express Hotshot Service LLC and Wayne Jefcoat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
