Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen v. Hinton
as 1:2015cv01292
Plaintiff:
Giang Thanh Nguyen
Defendant:
Sharon Hinton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DANIELS v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2014cv00442
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JOHN RAYMOND DANIELS
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON, FELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: The Home Depot, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 1:2014md02583
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc. and The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Northeastern Engineers Federal Credit Union , Pittsfield Cooperative Bank , Phenix-Girard Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scheuerman et al v. The Home Depot, Inc.,
as 1:2014cv03053
Plaintiff:
Kurt Scheuerman , Sonny Huynh , Sara Saffran and others
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
SHELTON R THOMAS
Defendant:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, SHARON LEWIS, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMER v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2014cv00259
Plaintiff:
DEXTER RAMONE PALMER
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON, GEORGE IVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 1:2014cv02183
Plaintiff:
Helen J. Hinton
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA , Rubin Lublin LLC , Bank of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
POWELL v. OWENS et al
as 5:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H POWELL
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
