Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Adams et al v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
Victor Adams, Jr, Victor Adams, Jr, Sheila Baker and others
Defendant:
Gary City of, Thomas Houston, Thomas Branson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOUSTON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
TONY HOUSTON
Defendant:
HELEN MARBERRY, HATTIE SIMS, DAVID YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
E&B REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC. v. HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY
as 3:2008cv00061
Plaintiff:
E&B REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRAY v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00464
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR L. BRAY
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, JAMIE HOUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NORINGTON v. CHILTON et al
as 1:2007cv01632
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA LASURE NORINGTON
Defendant:
TODD CHILTON, HOUSTON, K. BUTTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIDENER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2007cv01533
Plaintiff:
DAVID SIDENER
Defendant:
MR. STANLEY KNIGHT, MR. JAMIE HOUSTON, MR. ALLEN HOLDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green et al v. Westerfield et al
as 2:2007cv00389
Plaintiff:
Willie Green, Jr, Willie Green, Jr, Jacquelyn Green and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Westerfield, Jeffrey Westerfield, Thomas Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Freeman et al
as 2:2007cv00385
Plaintiff:
Detrick Houston
Defendant:
Bernard Freeman and Roy Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSTON et al v. FOUR WINDS INTERNATIONAL, CORP. et al
as 1:2007cv01340
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HOUSTON and LAURA HOUSTON
Defendant:
FOUR WINDS INTERNATIONAL, CORP. and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
