Cases 51 - 60 of 429
Coleman v. Humana, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
James Coleman
Defendant:
Humana, Inc. and Aspen Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cousins v. Humana Inc.
as 1:2022cv22560
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cousins
Defendant:
Humana Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Cousins, M.D. v. Humana Inc.
as 1:2022cv22562
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cousins, M.D.
Defendant:
Humana Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Cousins, M.D. v. Humana Inc.
as 1:2022cv22559
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cousins, M.D.
Defendant:
Humana Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company, et al
as 22-55631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABC SERVICES GROUP, INC., in its capacity as assignee for the benefit of creditors for Morningside Recovery, LLC,
Defendant / Appellee:
AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM, INC., DBA Anthem Health, Inc. and others
Elliot v. Humana, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
David Elliot
Defendant:
Humana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tri-City Healthcare District v. Humana, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
Tri-City Healthcare District doing business as Tri-City Medical Center
Defendant:
Humana, Inc. and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mm Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Calvin v. Humana Inc
as 9:2022cv80804
Plaintiff:
Matthew Calvin
Defendant:
Humana Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brooks et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Vicky L Brooks and Joshua Brooks
Defendant:
United States of America, UAB Hospital, UAHSF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
