Cases 51 - 60 of 149
Richard Standridge v. J. Shartle
as 16-16338
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD E. STANDRIDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE
Simmons v. Shartle
as 2:2016cv02629
Petitioner:
Dexter Q. Simmons
Respondent:
J. T. Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jason Scott v. Warden J.T. Shartle
as 16-6653
Petitioner - Appellant:
JASON SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN J. T. SHARTLE, named as FCC Warden, SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, named as USP Warden, Tucson, AZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
CAMPBELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv08113
Plaintiff:
GERALD LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOUGHTY, F. OLMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv07888
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01784
Plaintiff:
GERALD LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOUGHTY, F. OLMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01671
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFIELD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv00558
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, INMATE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION SYSTEM , FPI-INMATE CLAIMS EXAMINERS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv02175
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
