Cases 51 - 60 of 307
GARRETT v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2011cv01888
Plaintiff:
KAREEM GARRETT
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, KEVIN BARNHARDT, FRANCO TASSONE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LLOYD v. DR. JAWAD A. SALAMEH et al
as 3:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
AARON PAUL LLOYD
Defendant:
DR. JAWAD A. SALAMEH, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHERWOOD v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
BRENTT SHERWOOD
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO, PAUL WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv00202
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Beard et al
as 3:2011cv00004
Petitioner:
David Scott Sims
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Beard, PA State Attorney General and District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
West v. Beard et al
as 1:2010cv02621
Plaintiff:
Larry West
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, David Varano, Kandis Dascani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSSINGER v. BEARD et al
as 1:2010cv00303
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BUSSINGER
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD , DEBRA K. SAUERS , M. P. TOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. KLOPOTOSKI et al
as 2:2010cv07241
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, MALVIN S. LOCKETT, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. PA. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv02527
Plaintiff:
Alton D. Brown
Defendant:
PA. Dept. of Corrections, Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. PA DEPT. OF CORRS. et al
as 2:2010cv01599
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant:
PA DEPT. OF CORRS., JEFFREY A. BEARD, TIMOTHY I. MARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
