Cases 51 - 60 of 365
Scates v. Doe et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
David M Scates
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tulk v. Cavender et al
as 2:2015cv11653
Plaintiff:
Sherry A. Tulk
Defendant:
East End Main Street , Charleston Main Streets , Affiliate Organizations and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Morris v. Western Regional Jail et al
as 3:2017cv01148
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Morris
Defendant:
Western Regional Jail
Consol_defendant:
Jim Rubenstein and Janet Pettey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuhn v. Justice et al
as 2:2017cv01147
Plaintiff:
Michael Kuhn
Defendant:
Jim Justice, Benita F. Murphy and Jim Rubenstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Gregory et al
as 2:2017cv01007
Plaintiff:
James A. Lucas
Defendant:
Teresa Gregory, David Ballard and Jim Rubenstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2015cv16208
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , John Frame , David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tulk v. The Democratic National Party et al
as 2:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Sherry A. Tulk
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballengee v. CBS Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Samuel R. Ballengee
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, CBS Broadcasting, Inc., CBS News, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDermitt v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
William Ray McDermitt
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Patrick Mirandy and Tammy Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDermitt v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
William Ray McDermitt
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Patrick Mirandy, Tammy Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
