Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 31,281
Hunt, et al. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Pwc), et al.
as 24-3568
Plaintiff: JAMES EVERETT HUNT, JUAN RODRIGUEZ, KURT VOUTAZ and others
Defendant: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP (PWC), BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION, J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04750
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Juan Roman Ramos v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04738
Petitioner: Juan Roman Ramos
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02128
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Navarro
as 24-10494
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Juan Navarro, Jr.
Batista Martinez v. Perez Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv01033
Plaintiff: Juan Batista Martinez
Defendant: Artavia Perez Bryant and CH2 Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NUNEZ et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv04297
Plaintiff: JUAN NUNEZ and Domingo Nunez Rodriguez
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cedano Jr. v. Harvard Protection Services LLC
as 1:2024cv04296
Plaintiff: Juan Cedano Jr.
Defendant: Harvard Protection Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Juan Ramirez-Acosta v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1961
Petitioner: JUAN RAMIREZ-ACOSTA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Kissimina et al v. Ed's Lobster Bar, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04261
Plaintiff: Nade Kissimina, Marilyn Roxana Pinargote Urbina, Pedro Franco and others
Defendant: Ed's Lobster Bar, LLC and Edward McFarland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?