Cases 51 - 60 of 883
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowell v. Obion County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Hailey Crowell
Defendant:
Obion County, Tennessee, Karl Jackson and Terrell Clinic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v.County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government, Bryan Sinclair Ellis, County of Hamilton, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County City, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller v. County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Matthew Drew Miller
Defendant:
County of Hamilton, Tennessee, Sheriff Jim Hammond, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
