Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 627
Villareal v. City Of San Jose et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv09152
Plaintiff: January Villareal and January Nicole Villareal
Defendant: City Of San Jose and Matthew Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Columbus Life Insurance Company v. Delp et al
as 1:2022cv00753
Plaintiff: Columbus Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Cleves Delp, Cleves Delp, Trustee of Delp Independence Trust dated July 2 1999, Dominic J. Spinazze and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Kinnie Ma Ira et al v. National Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01325
Plaintiff: KINNIE MA IRA, JEFFERY S. GRAMM IRA, STACY GREASOR IRA and others
Defendant: NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION, National Securities Corporation, B. RILEY FINANCIAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Jackson Pryor Group v. Manuel Lima, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16899
Plaintiff / Appellant: JACKSON PRYOR GROUP, a California limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee: MANUEL LIMA, as Trustees of the Trust established under Declaration dated January 13, 1994 and SUSANNE LIMA, as Trustees of the Trust established under Declaration dated January 13, 1994
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Sabor Y Sazon Peruvian Restaurant, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv04299
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. as Broadcast Licensee of the January 28, 2022 Colombia / Peru Soccer Match doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Sabor Y Sazon Peruvian Restaurant, LLC doing business as Sabor Y Sazon doing business as Sabor Y Sazon Peruvian Restaurant, Carmen Malen Rivero doing business as Sabor Y Sazon doing business as Sabor Y Sazon Peruvian Restaurant, Maria Rivero doing business as Sabor Y Sazon doing business as Sabor Y Sazon Peruvian Restaurant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. La Cazuela, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv04298
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. as Broadcast Licensee of the January 28, 2022 Colombia / Peru Soccer Match doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: La Cazuela, Inc. doing business as La Cazuela Colombian Restaurant doing business as La Cazuela, Fanny Pena doing business as La Cazuela Colombian Restaurant doing business as La Cazuela and Oscar Hugo Pena doing business as La Cazuela Colombian Restaurant doing business as La Cazuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Trump v. Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol et al
as 9:2022cv81758
Plaintiff: Donald J Trump
Defendant: Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Sullivan et al v. Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01440
Plaintiff: Rodrick Sullivan, Robert McRina, Elbert Lewis and others
Defendant: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David SandersIn re: David Sanders
as 22-80131
Respondent: In re: DAVID B. SANDERS, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: January 3, 2006
John Eastman v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 22-56013
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN C. EASTMAN
Defendant / Appellee: BENNIE G. THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol; Rayburn House Office Building, 2466, Washington, DC 20515, SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE JANUARY 6 ATTACK ON THE US CAPITOL and CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY, 1 University Dr. Orange, CA 92866

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?