Cases 51 - 60 of 118
Dillion v. Grondolsky
as 4:2010cv40020
Petitioner:
Grover L. Dillion
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wetmore v. Grondolsky
as 4:2009cv40226
Petitioner:
Joel Wetmore
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03245
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2009cv06170
Petitioner:
DON THOMAS
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, ROD ROSENSTEIN and JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gadson v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2009cv00915
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Gadson
Defendant:
Jeff Grondolsky, Michael K. Loucks, Mark J. Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv40207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOODMAN v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv05371
Petitioner:
WILLIE L. GOODMAN
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TOOLASPRASHAD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv05335
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, KATHLEEN M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Mai v. Grondolsky
as 4:2009cv40179
Petitioner:
Flex Quoc Mai
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniel v. Grondolsky
as 4:2009cv40180
Petitioner:
William T. Daniel
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
