Cases 51 - 60 of 173
Pierce et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mc00003
Plaintiff:
Jesse Pierce and Michael Pierce
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Moore v. Unilever BCA US, Inc., et al.
as 2:2018cv02067
Plaintiff:
Jesse Moore
Defendant:
Unilever BCA US, Inc. and Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Mike Forbess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christy v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jamey Ray Christy
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Eric Bryant, Danny Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. Premium Brands, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2017cv00340
Plaintiff:
Jason Shaun Hill , Joshua Jesse Gordon and Max Abram Underwood
Defendant:
Premium Brands, Inc. , Blair Carter , Bob Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
HARPER v. Regions Bank
as 2:2017cv02855
Plaintiff:
Jesse Harper
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melvin Ingram, et al v. Robert Moore, et al
as 2:2017cv02795
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ingram , Shantel Adams , David Beck and others
Defendant:
Robert Moore , Charlene McGhee , Debra Hammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02419
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Jesse Lee William Linboom
Plaintiff:
Linda K Henry
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Phillips et al (TV2)
as 3:2017cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jesse Perry
Defendant:
Scott County, Ronnie Phillips, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blankenship v. Crossville, City of, Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
James R. Blankenship
Defendant:
Crossville, Tennessee, City of, Jesse Kerley and Ivy Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loudermilk v. Reese et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Chad Loudermilk
Defendant:
Jessica Reece, City of Dayton Tennessee, Rhea County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
