Cases 51 - 60 of 725
Smith v. Biden et al
as 5:2023cv05072
Plaintiff:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Mike Pense and Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Page, III, Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Holman et al
as 4:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniels
Defendant:
Adam B Holman and Joe Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McAdams v. Kidd et al
as 6:2023cv06030
Plaintiff:
Joe B. McAdams
Defendant:
Brandon Franklin Kidd and Kidd Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Hobbs, II v. Cpl. Byrd, et al
as 3:2023cv03015
Plaintiff:
Michael Ransom Hobbs, II
Defendant:
Baxter County Detention Center, Jailer Joe Willbanks, Sergeant Tabitha Maze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Page
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Joe Page, Arkansas Department of Corrections, M Cobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Lee et al
as 4:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Odrell Young
Defendant:
Eugene Lee, Sheila Williams, Emmer Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Sabri LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Sabri LLC doing business as Khalil's Pub & Grill and Khalil I Moussa
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Communications Act
Richardson v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Joe Richardson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parmley v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Frank Parmley
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
