Cases 51 - 60 of 119
Jackson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Arthur Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudd v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00561
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Sgt. Thompkins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Ray Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searight v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00429
Defendant:
Captain Lawson, Alabama Department of Corrections, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
John Searight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broughton v. Shepard et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Mr. Lt. McCovery, Sgt. Lovejoy, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gerell Broughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00353
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Easterling Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00348
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Mrs Truss and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Crow
as 2:2020cv00468
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lee Ellison
Respondent:
John Crow, III and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Warden Crow, Warden Miles, Joseph Headley and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Jacobey Johnson, Warden Crow, William Caulfield and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00059
Defendant:
John Crow, Jefferson S. Dunn and Kay Ivey
Plaintiff:
David Dewayne Oliver, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.