Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 156
Ramirez v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv02579
Plaintiff: Luis Alfonso Solares Ramirez
Defendant: John Hickenlooper, Rick Raemish, Tiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. HICKENLOOPER et al
as 1:2016cv01882
Plaintiff: LUIS ALFONSO SOLARES RAMIREZ
Defendant: JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISH, TIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kherdeen v. Obabma et al
as 3:2016cv02304
Plaintiff: Mazen J. Kherdeen
Defendant: Barack Hussein Obabma, U.S. Government Executive Branch, John Hickenlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bretz v. Owens et al
as 1:2016cv02166
Plaintiff: Kevin Bretz
Defendant: Bill Owens and John Hickenlooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hentges v. Walter
as 1:2016cv01891
Plaintiff: John M. Hentges
Defendant: Carol A. Walter, John C. Hugger, Chris Voisinet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv01725
Plaintiff: Torrey Banks
Defendant: John Hickenlooper, Kurt Pierpoint, Ed Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hentges v. Walter et al
as 1:2016cv01480
Plaintiff: John M. Hentges
Defendant: Carol A. Walter, Jamin M. Alabiso, Jamin (I) M. Alabiso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. State of Colorado, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1226
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAUL JERRY GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, JOHN HICKENLOOPER, CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN and others
Himes v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01315
Plaintiff: Eddie Himes
Defendant: Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. Colorado Dept. Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01105
Plaintiff: Felix D. Lujan
Defendant: Colorado Dept. Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?