Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Kent et al v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00387
Plaintiff:
Carol Louise Kent and William Kent
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc, ESI Lederle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarrard v. Kent Investment Corporation
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Jarrard
Defendant:
Kent Investment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bennett et al v. Bryant Arkansas Planning Commission et al
as 4:2009cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Bennett, Christine Bennett, Freddie Marsh and others
Defendant:
Bryant Arkansas Planning Commission, Lance Penfield, Michael Sebren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sidney v. Kent Dobbs Automotive, Inc.
as 5:2008cv05226
Plaintiff:
Kathleen D Sidney
Defendant:
Kent Dobbs Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Darling v. Outlaw
as 2:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Kent Peter Darling
Defendant:
Outlaw
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Eshleman et al v. Wyeth Inc et al
as 4:2008cv01814
Defendant:
Wyeth Inc, Wyeth Inc, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Suzann Eshleman, Suzann Eshleman, Kent Hubbell and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Burks v. Sims et al
as 4:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Hutson L Burks
Defendant:
Berry Sims, Larry Jegley, John Hout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winstead et al v. Stodola et al
as 4:2007cv00682
Plaintiff:
Nicole Winstead, Stephan Pettus, Aretha Ward and others
Defendant:
Mark Stodola, Tom Carpenter, Little Rock, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Nabors v. Dutton
as 2:2007cv02062
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kent Nabors
Defendant:
John Anthony Dutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jordan et al
as 5:2007cv00092
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
Pearle Mae Jordan, Gwendolyn Stephenson, Kent Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
