Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 51 - 60 of 182
Bailey v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01350
Plaintiff: Alfonte Bailey
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Defendant: Kim Thomas, Corizon Medical Services and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv01313
Petitioner: Charles Randall Stewart
Respondent: Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Metcalf v. Agee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2014cv01196
Plaintiff: Ivan Quintel Metcalf
Defendant: Agee, Gene Mitchel, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Thomas et al
as 2:2014cv01174
Plaintiff: Roy Burns
Defendant: Kim Thomas and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.M. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01157
Plaintiff: A. M.
Defendant: Kim Thomas and Dewayne Estes
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E.M. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01161
Plaintiff: E.M.
Defendant: Kim Thomas and Dewayne Estes
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01160
Plaintiff: Derrick Moss
Defendant: Kim Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Medical Services
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00601
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
K.M. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01150
Plaintiff: K. M.
Defendant: Kim Thomas, Dewayne Estes and Fred Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.J. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01127
Plaintiff: M. J.
Defendant: Kim Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Medical Services
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?