Cases 51 - 60 of 409
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02346
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Rigney et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rigney, Danielle Hall, Tracy Kilburn and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., James Hughey and Sherry Hughey
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101 Interstate Commerce Act
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baker v. Shelby County Board of Education
as 2:2022cv02108
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Baker
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education, JB Blocker and Angela Hargrave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller et al v. Morrison-Newman et al
as 2:2022cv02067
Plaintiff:
Jafarris Miller, Kimberly Muhammad and Althea Simmons
Defendant:
Regina Morrison-Newman, Dillon Holzemer, Randy Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perkins v. S.C.C.F. Core Civic et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jerome Perkins
Defendant:
S.C.C.F. Core Civic, (f/n/u) Perry, R-DAP Program - Counselors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
