Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Soraya Kister v. U.S. Attorney General
as 15-15601
Petitioner:
SORAYA CRISTINA DE OLI KISTER
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gulbronson v. Martell et al
as 3:2015cv01910
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Gulbronson and Conrad E. Gulbronson
Defendant:
c/o M. Narvaez, c/o Garza, Anderson, LCSW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Washington v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2015cv02238
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Department, N. Morse, G. Kister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sankofa v. Normand et al
as 2:2015cv01679
Plaintiff:
Yimlah S Sankofa
Defendant:
Newell Normand, Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, George Kister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soraya Kister v. U.S. Attorney General
as 14-15227
Petitioner:
SORAYA CRISTINA DE OLI KISTER
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kister v. Appalachian Behavorial Health Care et al
as 2:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Chad Kister
Defendant:
Appalachian Behavorial Health Care , Jane Krason , Mary Beth Holler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chad Kister v. Appalachian Behavioral Healthcare
as 2:2012cv01225
Petitioner:
Chad Kister
Respondent:
Appalachian Behavioral Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anaeme v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv01768
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , Allied Security Holdings, L.L.C., AlliedBarton Security Services, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Kister v. Kelly et al
as 2:2012cv00572
Plaintiff:
Chad Kister
Defendant:
Pat Kelly, Bruce Fick, Jack E. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kister v. Henry et al
as 2:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
Chad Kister
Defendant:
Chris Henry, Jeff Benseler, Pat Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
