Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Knight v. DePuy Orthopaedics Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00946
Plaintiff:
Kevin Knight
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Incorporated, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Products Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Espinoza v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03983
Plaintiff:
Adrien Joshua Espinoza
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, S Mangan, T Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Caroline's Treasures Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03923
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Powers
Defendant:
Caroline's Treasures Incorporated, Ronald D Rutherford, Jr. and Walter Dennis Knight
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nelson v. Newmark Knight Frank et al
as 2:2017cv03150
Plaintiff:
Wade Nelson
Defendant:
Newmark Knight Frank, BGC Partners Incorporated and G&E Real Estate Management Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02630
Plaintiff:
Andrew Knight
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02623
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Knight et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02407
Plaintiff:
Damian V Knight and Rashan Knight
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sciabacucchi v. Swift Transportation Company et al
as 2:2017cv01683
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sciabacucchi
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company, Richard H Dozer, Glenn Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Appolon v. The et al
as 4:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Esterlin Appolon
Defendant:
Kevin The, Chris Magus, Marco Borboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Romero et al
as 4:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Colinda Kay Knight
Defendant:
Victor Loren Romero and United Parcel Service Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
