Cases 51 - 60 of 14,755
HARTEL et al v. BEAZER EAST, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01629
Plaintiff:
KELLY K. HARTEL and ROBERT L. HARTEL, JR.
Defendant:
BEAZER EAST, INC., INDSPEC CHEMICAL CORPORATION, INTERSTATE CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
SHEPARD v. OVERMEYER
as 1:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
LORETTA SHEPARD
Defendant:
MICHELLE OVERMEYER, KIMBERLY DREISCHALICK, KELLY CLAYPOOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
DAVIS v. GEORGE W. HILL'S MEDICAL UNIT et al
as 2:2023cv03760
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DAVIS
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL'S MEDICAL UNIT, BASHEER, CHELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BYRD and Al-Tariq Sharif Ali Byrd
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, CHIEF DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moat v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2023cv04010
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Moat
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, INGENESIS, INC., JESSICA KEITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. POWER INNOVATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01493
Plaintiff:
JAMES MAXWELL
Defendant:
POWER INNOVATIONS, INC., KIMBERLY KELLY, SCOTT KELLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
