Cases 51 - 60 of 1,091
Tidwell v. Dunlap et al
as 2:2018cv01369
Plaintiff:
Cleother Tidwell
Defendant:
Kimberly Ulrich, Nichole Dunlap and Ashley McCaslin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redden v. Sandy et al
as 1:2018cv00187
Defendant:
Wexford (Medical) Health Sources Inc., Pitt. PA, Doctor Proctor, Doctor Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Redden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tidwell v. Kink et al
as 2:2018cv01213
Defendant:
Julia A. Petty, Kevin Kink, Kimberly Ulrich and others
Plaintiff:
Cleother Tidwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stohl v. Proctor et al
as 2:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Regis Joseph Stohl
Defendant:
Michael Martin, David Proctor, Kimberly Paton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien v. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company
as 2:2018cv01089
Plaintiff:
Kimberly O'Brien
Defendant:
Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swihart v. Tekni-Plex, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Swihart
Defendant:
Tekni-Plex, Inc. and Nordmeccanica N.A., LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobs et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01012
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jacobs and Dave Jacobs
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryan , Brenda Bryan , Joseph Kramar and others
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. , Tug Hill Operating, LLC and TH Exploration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-016.000-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-016.000-ROW, Jerry E. Hyatt, Michael Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
