Cases 51 - 60 of 173
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ruiz v. Link et al
as 7:2020cv00235
Defendant:
P. Link, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Telmate, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Global Tel Link and Telmate, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tyler A. Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Burrell v. Oneida County et al
as 9:2019cv01629
Defendant:
SM Dental, Anthony Picente, Peter Rayhill and others
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. National Golf Links of America et al
as 2:2019cv07052
Defendant:
William Muller and National Golf Links of America
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Groves et al v. Capital Link Management, LLC
as 1:2019cv01491
Defendant:
Capital Link Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Susanna Groves, Eddie Beausoliel, Eddie Murdock and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hudson Valley Engineering Associates, P.C. v. KS Engineers, P.C. et al
as 7:2019cv07060
Plaintiff:
Hudson Valley Engineering Associates, P.C.
Defendant:
KS Engineers, P.C. and NYNJ Link Developer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quito v. Emmut Properties Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv06956
Defendant:
Property Link Mgmt., LLC, Rachel Young, Emmut Properties Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Segundo Quinto and Segundo Quito
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thimes Solutions Inc. v. TP Link USA Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv04970
Defendant:
TP-Link USA Corporation, Mikhail Fikhman, 3PM Shield LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Thimes Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv04091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
