Cases 51 - 60 of 80
In Re: iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 5:2011md02250
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodimer, Cole Parr, William Moylan and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., TrafficMarketplace.com. Inc., Yelp!, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Eduardo Gonzalez-Gallego
as 13-57089
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO GONZALEZ-GALLEGOS, AKA Mike Bibby, AKA Frenchie, AKA Lalo, AKA Pup, AKA Red Stepper, AKA Sacra, AKA Stepper, AKA Young One, AKA Young Stud, AKA Youngster
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cavazos et al v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company et al
as 7:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo "Lalo" Cavazos and Barbara Cavazos
Defendant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company and Daniel Kevin McSkimming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Correa v. Gibson et al
as 2:2013cv00776
Plaintiff:
Henry Lalo Correa
Defendant:
Connie Gibson, E. Mendez, Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Correa v. Gibson et al
as 1:2013cv00598
Plaintiff:
Henry Lalo Correa
Defendant:
Connie Gibson, E. Mendez, Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al
as 5:2010cv05878
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lalo , Dustin Freeman , Jared Parsley and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc , Backflip , Dictionary.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lalos v. City of Springfield
as 3:2012cv30213
Plaintiff:
Alex Lalos
Defendant:
City of Springfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Correa v. Gipson
as 2:2012cv02683
Petitioner:
Henry Lalo Correa
Respondent:
Connie Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Correa v. Gipson
as 3:2012cv05396
Petitioner:
Henry Lalo Correa
Respondent:
Connie Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
