Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Hatchett v. Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.
as 2:2008cv13554
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hatchett
Defendant:
Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mangioni v. Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.
as 1:2008cv03655
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Mangioni and Joseph R Mangioni
Defendant:
Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burnette v. IDT Carmel, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00412
Plaintiff:
Courtney Burnette and Courtney Burnette
Defendant:
IDT Carmel, Inc., Oxford Management Services, Inc., Bay Area Credit Service, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOHNSON v. LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL N. KAY, P.C.
as 1:2007cv01272
Plaintiff:
GREGORY C. JOHNSON, GREGORY C. JOHNSON, GREGORY C. JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL N. KAY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
