Cases 51 - 60 of 134
McNeil v. Scott et al
as 5:2015cv01233
Plaintiff:
David J McNeil
Defendant:
Charles Scott, Scott Brady, James G Cowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Baker et al
as 3:2015cv00215
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Brandon M. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
D'AMICO v. CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC et al
as 4:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
STEVEN F D'AMICO
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VERNON MONTOYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWELL v. CREWS et al
as 1:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
PAUL TIMOTHY NEWELL
Defendant:
M HICKS, M DE LACERNA, RIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks e al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv18888
Plaintiff:
Elisha M. Hicks and Daniel Hicks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanz et al v. Johny Utah 51 LLC et al
as 1:2014cv04380
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Sanz , Bryan Harmin , Annya Santana and others
Defendant:
Johny Utah 51 LLC, John Sullivan, Thomas Casabona, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hicks v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08550
Plaintiff:
Exie M. Hicks
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv06870
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Hicks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv06203
Plaintiff:
Brandi M. Hicks
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06330
Plaintiff:
Emma M. Hicks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
