Cases 51 - 60 of 63
GRANT v. POLICE OFFICER TIFFANY WINIK et al
as 2:2009cv01580
Plaintiff:
TRACY GRANT
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER TIFFANY WINIK, TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RETZLER et al v. WALLACE et al
as 2:2008cv04245
Plaintiff:
WESTLEY RETZLER and LAURA WARDEN
Defendant:
EDWARD WALLACE, TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, BUCKS COUNTY DETECTIVES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RETZLER v. MCANDREW et al
as 2:2008cv03919
Plaintiff:
WESTLEY A. RETZLER
Defendant:
JAMES P. MCANDREW, DAVID WOODARD, ROBERT GORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RETZLER v. MCANDREW et al
as 2:2008cv02764
Plaintiff:
WESTLEY A. RETZLER
Defendant:
JAMES P. MCANDREW and DAVID WOODARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCANDREW v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75089
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAYES MCANDREW
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCANDREW v. MUNSHOWER et al
as 2:2007cv05537
Plaintiff:
KELLY MCANDREW
Defendant:
JOHN MUNSHOWER and FAMILY CARE ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BAKER et al v. FENTON et al
as 2:2007cv04081
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER and CATHY BAKER
Defendant:
SAM FENTON, JAMES McANDREW, DON LORADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCANDREWS v. COPELAND et al
as 2:2007cv02090
Plaintiff:
DAVID POLICE OFFICER MCANDREWS
Defendant:
BRIAN COPELAND and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PANNELL v. SHANNON et al
as 2:2007cv01944
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PANNELL
Defendant:
ROBERT SHANNON, DIGUGLIELMO, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCANDREW v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2007cv00628
Plaintiff:
JUDITH MCANDREW
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
