Cases 51 - 60 of 74
KANTE v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
MAFOUEDIE KANTE
Defendant:
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, SCHINDLER ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ruiz v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Maria Ruiz
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Turman v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC
as 1:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Deborah Turman
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings Inc. and Macys Retail Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pool v. Macy's Retail Holding LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Mary A Pool
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holding LLC and KBS LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gatlin v. Macy's, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Sharon Gatlin
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC LA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
UMB Bank, N.A. v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC
as 1:2021cv02225
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bommarito v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Annette Bommarito
Defendant:
Macys Retail Holdings, LLC and John Doe Number One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
