Cases 51 - 60 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mario Lopez v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05102
Plaintiff:
Mario Lopez
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stumpf et al v. The City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2015cv01944
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stumpf and Carol Stumpf
Defendant:
The City of Dallas Texas , Paul Pepe MD , Johnny Lynn Rudder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00966
Plaintiff:
Mario Lopez
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mario Lopez v. Vickie Lynn Haley et al
as 2:2014cv07312
Defendant:
Kathy Eileen Haley and Vickie Lynn Haley
Plaintiff:
Mario Lopez
Bernardo Lopez-Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72492
Petitioner:
BERNARDO MARIO LOPEZ-CARRILLO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Cuevas et al v. Southland Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02368
Plaintiff:
Anselmo Cuevas , Martin Vaquera , Jose Alfredo aka Jose Alvarez and others
Defendant:
Southland Landscaping, Inc. and John French
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Warner v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Charles Clay Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice , Daniel S Rogers, Edward McQuade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
