Cases 51 - 60 of 145
Roberts v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00277
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Marvin Evans, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Lester v. Bradford Phelps, et al
as 14-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant - Appellee:
Bradford J. Phelps, Chief Deputy, Arkansas Attorney General, Marvin Evans, Jr., Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC and others
Sherman v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs and Marvin Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Robins et al
as 1:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Lisa Murphy
Defendant:
Virginia Robins , Billy Vaulner , Nurzuhal Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Chambers et al
as 5:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
David Page
Defendant:
Gregory T Chambers, Charlie Strickland, Tevin Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lomax v. Banks et al
as 5:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lomax
Defendant:
James Banks, James Gibson and Marvin Evans, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Greg Harmon, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Greg Harmon, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushing v. Guy et al
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Rushing
Defendant:
Guy, Marvin Evans, Jr, Chris Goforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Straughn et al
as 5:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
William Straughn, Maurice Williams, Justine Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
