Cases 51 - 60 of 75
SCHAFLE et al v. TAKATA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv06628
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHAFLE, SIAN SCHAFLE, TED PEPIN and others
Defendant:
TAKATA CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC., HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
McDonough et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 3:2014cv01807
Plaintiff:
James McDonough and Jill McDonough
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ANDREWS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 2:2014cv03930
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN ANDREWS
Defendant:
ALEXANDRA MCDONOUGH , JOHN DOE OR JANE DOES NO. 1 and JOHN DOE OR JANE DOES NO. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONOUGH et al v. IACOBINO et al
as 2:2014cv01312
Plaintiff:
LAUREN MCDONOUGH and DOUGLAS MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
LAUREN IACOBINO and JOHN IACOBINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tarapchak v. Schuylkill County
as 3:2013cv01895
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Tarapchak
Defendant:
Schuylkill County, Lynn Bucklar, Frank McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAY v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK T. RAY
Defendant:
JEFF ROGERS, DAVID MITCHELL, COI HARKLEROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONOUGH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56217
Plaintiff:
HUBERT A. MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MCDONOUGH v. UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE
as 2:2011cv01204
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
JOHNSON v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DURHAM COUNTY OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 2:2011cv04451
Plaintiff:
YEROU JOHNSON
Defendant:
POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DURHAM COUNTY OF NORTH CAROLINA, E.J. JEFFRIES and MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
