Cases 51 - 60 of 158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAAR et al
as 1:2020cv02449
Defendant:
MEGAN E. MAAR, EMILY MAAR ST. CHARLES, SARAH MAAR and others
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
BOYD v. STATON et al
as 1:2020cv02287
Defendant:
COURTNEY LEANNE STATON, DANIEL WHITEHEAD, THOMAS NEWMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK LEE BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2020 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 3:2020mc00017
In Re:
Mark Arnold Werling, John Christopher Havill, Steven Stoy Crone and others
Strack v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2020cv00391
Defendant:
Lena Snethen, Adam Krupp, Jena and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Strack
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAAR et al
as 1:2020cv01089
Defendant:
MEGAN E. MAAR, DEBORAH H. MAAR, INDIVIDUALLY, SARAH K. MAAR and others
Plaintiff:
GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
