Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 145
Harvey PrestonIn re: Harvey Preston
as 22-2024
Petitioner: In re: HARVEY LEE PRESTON
Respondent: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Marquisse Parks v. Michael Burgess
as 22-2001
Petitioner / Appellant: MARQUISSE DAVON PARKS
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Gresham #272603 v. Akins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01016
Plaintiff: RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant: Unknown Akins, J. Erway, Michael Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talvest Allen v. Michael Burgess
as 22-1975
Petitioner / Appellant: TALVEST LASALLE ALLEN
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden, Oaks Correctional Facility
Harvey PrestonIn re: Harvey Preston
as 22-1966
Petitioner: In re: HARVEY LEE PRESTON
Respondent: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden and BILL SCHUETTE
Smith #210974 v. Parish et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00978
Plaintiff: Grayling Trigg Smith #210974
Defendant: Les Parish, Jennifer Dalton, R. Crompton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller #424245 v. Burgess et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00958
Plaintiff: Jay Waller #424245
Defendant: Michael Burgess, Thomas Parish, Jeffery Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Lee v. Michael Burgess
as 22-1872
Petitioner / Appellant: BRIAN CHRISTOPHER LEE
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Martin v. Burgess
as 2:2022cv12260
Petitioner: Deandre Martin
Respondent: Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
City of North Charleston Municipal Sykes v.
as 2:2022cv03089
Plaintiff: Dewayne Alphonza Sykes and City of North Charleston Municipal Court
Defendant: City of North Charleston, Carlton Bourne, Tina Sutherland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?