Cases 51 - 60 of 1,379
Traboulsi v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2023cv12762
Plaintiff:
Micheal Chaalan Traboulsi
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Communication Commission, Michigan, State of and others
Dowdell v. Michigan, State of
as 1:2023cv01151
Petitioner:
Lawrence James Dowdell
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Amirul El v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv12587
Plaintiff:
Mikhael Amirul El
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Kinloch Jonathan, Timothy Kenny and others
Claimant:
Mikhael Amirul El Trust and Michael Anthony Bryant, TTEE
Tatum v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Solen-keith and Solon Keith Tatum
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Traci L. Schenkle, Kent County Friend of the Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Westland, City of et al
as 2:2023cv12567
Plaintiff:
Tyler Smith
Defendant:
City of Westland, a municipal corporation, Westland Police Department, Michigan State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michigan, State of v. Phillips
as 5:2023cv12572
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan and Michigan, State of
Defendant:
Justin Jarvis Jerome Phillips
Ahmed et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Tonya Ahmed and Brad Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Centreville, City of, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cornett v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2023cv12361
Plaintiff:
Robert James Cornett
Defendant:
Michigan, State of and John Doe
Franklin v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv12233
Plaintiff:
Andre Eward Franklin
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Genesee County Jail and MDOC
Anderson v. Michigan, State of
as 2:2023cv12208
Petitioner:
Darnell Scott Anderson
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
