Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Ewing v. Hull et al
as 3:2012cv06011
Plaintiff:
Luis Anthony Ewing
Defendant:
Kevin Hull, Thurman Lowans, Jay B Roof and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Coyle v. Baker
as 2:2012cv00601
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lynn Coyle
Defendant:
Rebecca M Baker , Chris A Montgomery, Allen C Nielson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aainfinity v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01868
Plaintiff:
Spaceman O Aainfinity
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Attorney General, United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Densmore v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2012cv01444
Plaintiff:
James Michael Densmore
Defendant:
Snohomish County , Snohomish County Sheriff's Office , Thomas Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00908
Plaintiff:
Michael S Montgomery
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Zhou v. Carter et al
as 2:2010cv01538
Plaintiff:
Long Zhou
Defendant:
Bruce L A Carter, James A Harper, Edward E Penhoet and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mesa v. ZymoGenetics Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01486
Plaintiff:
Rhonda M. Mesa
Defendant:
ZymoGenetics Inc, BRUCE L.A. CARTER, JAMES A. HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Snyder v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2010cv05286
Plaintiff:
Brian N. Snyder
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources, Peter Goldmark and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Davis v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2009cv01504
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J Davis, Jr
Defendant:
State of Washington, Karen Havertake, Michael Woodhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
