Cases 51 - 60 of 71
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2009cv05460
Plaintiff:
National trust for historic preservation in the united states, National trust for historic preservation in the united states and National trust for historic preservation in the united states
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Eric Shinseki, Federal Emergency Management Agency and others
Movant:
City of New Orleans and Louisiana division of administration, office of facility planning and control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Reports
The Wilderness Society et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
The Wilderness Society et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 9:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument, National Trust for Historic Preservation and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
The Wilderness Society et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 3:2009cv03048
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, BARK, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Ken Salazar, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Montana Wilderness Association v. Connell et al
as 4:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Montana Wilderness Association , The Wilderness Society , Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument and others
Defendant:
Gene R. Terland , Mike Pool , Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor:
Recreational Aviation Foundation and Montana Pilots Association
Intervenor_defendant:
Missouri River Stewards , Fergus County , Phillips County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2009cv00803
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ERIC SHINSEKI, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Whitehouse Hotel, et al v. CIR
as 09-60085
Petitioner - Appellant:
WHITEHOUSE HOTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and QHR HOLDINGS - NEW ORLEANS LIMITED, Tax Matters Partner
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES
The Wilderness Society et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 2:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, The Wilderness Society, Arizona Wilderness Coalition and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, Ron Wenker, James Kenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Wilderness Society, et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2009cv08010
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Society, Wilderness Society, Arizona Wilderness Coalition and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management, Ron Wenker, James Kenna and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE et al v. ALLRED et al
as 1:2008cv02187
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Defendant:
C. STEPHEN ALLRED, KENT HOFFMAN and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
